Enhancements to the Video Web: The Mini-Camcorder Du Jour & Intelligent Video Conversations
A couple of quick blog bites (vs sound bites) from the NYTimes website which indicate continually brighter days ahead for what I affectionately call The Video Web:
First of all, my fave tech writer David Pogue not only reviewed my Christmas present (see posts and demo video below), The Flip Ultra, but his latest โState of the Artโ column, โCamcorder Brings Zen to the Shootโ pretty much nails it. It also informed meโand I had no idea about thisโthat the Flip is now garnering a rich 17% of all US camcorder sales and โhas been the best-selling camcorder on Amazon.com since the day of its debut. For Pogueโs finely articulated perspective, click here.
The other item is what appears to be a new feature on the NYT website, which is Bloggingheads.tv โdiavlogs.โ Language-wise this is a double-derivative term. Iโll bet most people donโt even know that the term โblogโ is derived from โweb logโ let alone that a โvlogโ is a video blog. Just the same I welcome this combination that creates a new kind of conversation. (kind of rolls off the tongue) Iโve been thinking and occasionally saying that the use of webcams and the ease of the current state of video conferencing should be put to more use. Little did I know that this kind of video dialog, oh OK, diavlog was being so widely distributed. And then imagine my delight when I found at least these two commentators talking about the Barak Obama race speech being more articulate and interesting than most of those duds on cable TV news shows. Right on. It was also nice to see the NYTimes editing down and providing a solid 4-minute excerpt of what appears to be an almost hour-long original conversation on BloggingHeads.TV At least the whole thing is there for you if you want it.
Click here to watch the NYTimes-BloggingHeads edit: โObamaโs Grandmotherโ which asks the scintillating question: โIs everyone missing the whole point?โ
I have to add that the intelligence of this BloggingHeads conversation is in stark contrast to my experience experimenting with the Seesmic.com video โconversationโ website which is mentioned in the Davos post below. That turned out to be an interesting attempt from a technological point-of-view, but extremely boring overall. Even Seesmicโs specially produced (and apparently funded) posts were disappointing (to say the least). Sorry. I liked their bushy-eyed enthusiasm, but thereโs good web video and a lot that is not so good. Like everything elseโฆ